The Influence of Harness Design on Forelimb Biomechanics in Pet Dogs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v17iS1.1372Keywords:
Biomechanical impact of pet dog harnesses, Elbow and Shoulder flexion and extension, Canine gait during harness use, Canine pet harnesses, Quintic Software for canine gait analysis, Restrictive vs. non-restrictive harnessesAbstract
Dog harnesses are a popular walking aid for pet dogs. Research has focused on the biomechanical impact of assistance dog harnesses; however, this is lacking in the pet dog harness industry. This study aimed to explore the impact of six different harness types on canine biomechanics compared to a standard (base) collar, specifically analysing shoulder extension, shoulder flexion, elbow extension and elbow flexion. A high-speed recording device recorded a total of 21 videos per dog (n=30), and analysis demonstrated that the straight-front harness allowed for the most elbow and shoulder extension and flexion, whereas the front clip allowed for the least elbow and shoulder flexion and extension. By directly comparing the six harnesses, three of which are new to research inclusion, the evidence drawn demonstrates which harnesses should be utilised more and which should potentially be avoided. These results provide a foundation for future research, and recommendations have been outlined, specifically considering breed difference, morphological impacts and long-term effects of harness design on canine gait. With advancements in the canine industry, this research is crucial for maximising safety and potentially preventing or delaying various musculoskeletal disorders.
References
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lauren Dowdeswell, Lucianna Churchill

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing through any medium of communication those illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. Authors are also responsible for adding these permissions to the acknowledgement footnote that precedes all other notes or crediting the source and copyright of photographs or figures in the accompanying captions.
The journal's policy is to ask authors to grant us the licence to publish their work, which gives us the exclusive right both to reproduce and/or distribute their article (including the abstract) in printed, electronic or any other medium, and in turn to authorise others (including Reproduction Rights Organisations such as the Copyright Licensing Agency and the Copyright Clearance Center) to do the same. In return the author(s) assert their Moral Right to be identified as the author, and we promise that we will respect their rights as the author(s). That is, we will make sure that their name(s) is/are always clearly associated with the article and, while they do allow us to make necessary editorial changes, we will not make any substantial alteration to their article without consulting them.
Copyright remains with the author(s), however, the author(s) authorise us to act on their behalf to defend their copyright if anyone should infringe it, and to retain half of any damages awarded, after deducting our costs. The author(s) also retain the right to use their own article (provided they acknowledge the published original in standard bibliographic citation form) in the following ways, as long as they do not sell it or give it away in ways which would conflict directly with our interests. The author(s) is/are free to use their article for the internal educational or other purposes of their own institution or company; mounted on their own or their institution’s website; posted to free public servers of preprints and/or articles in their subject area; or in whole or in part, as the basis for their own further publications or spoken presentations.
If you have any queries about copyright please contact reinventionjournal@warwick.ac.uk